Since the American campaign to win Afghan hearts and minds isn’t going so well, a few enterprising soldiers decided to take a few scalps instead. Or more accurately, they took bones, skulls and fingers to keep as trophies from the Afghan civilians they killed, by their own admission, for ‘sport’.
And of course, being true children of the digital age, they took photos posing with the corpses of their victims, much as a hunter would do with a prize buck he has brought down on a weekend shooting trip — although the possibility of these pictures making it onto Facebook is slim at best.
You would have thought they would know better by now, given the massive scandal and outrage caused by the Abu Ghraib photos. Not only did the photos expose the institutionalised abuse sanctioned by the US military and government, it did more to turn Iraqis and the Muslim world against American policy than any al Qaeda videotape.
Not that the taking of such grisly prizes is limited to the Iraqi or Afghan theatres — the ears of Viet Cong dead were a favourite trophy during the Vietnam war, with American GIs wearing necklaces of ears as keepsakes from the battlefield. Go back further and the same pattern of behaviour can be found in the Pacific theatre of World War Two.
Let’s now rewind even further to the birth of America during what is probably the most successful genocide of modern times, the so-called Indian wars. Anyone with a passing familiarity with this period would likely comment on the propensity of the natives, disparagingly called ‘redskins’ to take the scalps of captured or killed white settlers, and certainly history supports the fact that taking the occasional scalp was part and parcel of inter-tribal native warfare.
But it took the white settlers to make a business out of it. As far back as 1703, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was offering $60 for each native scalp. And in 1756, Pennsylvania Governor Morris, in his declaration of war against the local native tribes, offered “130 Pieces of Eight (a type of coin), for the scalp of every male Indian enemy, above the Age of Twelve Years,” and “50 Pieces of Eight for the Scalp of Every Indian Woman, produced as evidence of their being killed.” The difficulty in telling a female scalp from a male one led to mass violence against anyone of native blood.
Fast forward a few centuries and the redskins, nips and gooks have been replaced by ragheads, ‘hadjis’ and ‘Talibs’. Some may claim that the soldiers acted in violation of their orders, that their actions cannot be taken as a true depiction of the behaviour expected from a US soldier. Still others may argue that all is fair in war, and that armies throughout history have done all this and far worse. But these soldiers belong to the armed forces of a nation that claims to hold the moral high ground, a claim it never ceases to harangue the rest of the world with.
Perhaps a clue lies in the name of one of the culprits: Corporal Jeremy Morlock. If memory serves me right, the Morlocks were the sub-human cannibalistic villains of the HG Wells classic the Time Machine. In the far future, they emerge nightly from their underground lairs to feed on the docile, and much more ‘human’ Elloi, who are unable to defend themselves. In light of the past, perhaps the future has already come to pass?
Published in The Express Tribune, October 1st, 2010.




Are you trying to suggest that America or indeed White People have a monopoly over barbarity?
Ignore Mr Sadir – he cant stand it if anyone so much as sneezes at Uncle Sam.
Great article – well over the head of the coconuts who will be outraged you dared to bring up Americans doing barbaric things.
@ Nadir – there are thousands of articles written about Muslims committing atrocities – do you write the equivalent comment there to ensure that no one nation/race/religion is portrayed as barbaric?
Excellent – have never read anything by you before – will look out for more.
“But these soldiers belong to the armed forces of a nation that claims to hold the moral high ground, a claim it never ceases to harangue the rest of the world with.”
Spot on brother! Brilliantly said. Glad you wrote this with such depth of history and not just vague comment.
Well said. Superb.
Totally agree with @Chris also.
No that is not he is suggesting at all. Why do we have so many burgers here who jump when anyone criticises America?
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/35-Pakistan-army-killings-back-in-spotlight-over-video-ak-03
What about this? Tribune doesn’t even report it.. Atrocities of Pakistan Army are equally shameful. There should be awareness about these issues within Pakistan and Pakistan should take its army to task as well.
@Kamal Ahmer: It is not about criticising America, but about the relevance of the post here. Don’t you think that the similar atrocities by our army should be viewed and interospected in the same way?
Pakistan has a lot to catch up if it has to be a stable country with little or no violence and food security for all. We need to put our house in order before commenting and harping others.
@Nadia. Mehere, Chris, Imran – Everyone knows America soldiers have a history of abusing human rights, listing events out here doesnt help to make anything better for us in Pakistan. The argument cant go, America is brutal, so if Muslims are brutal, well than perhaps thats not too bad then. Brutality has no religion and nationality, if you guys want to colour it as West vs. Islam, then you are feeding rhetoric to those who generalize the actions of one or two individuals as the act of the entire Muslim world.
I disagree completely. West is not out there to get us. When will we ever stop thinking on those lines? If it were than they could have achieved it by not giving us any aid and we would have slowly sank in these murky waters. The real enemy is the militancy and extremist ideology which pollutes our society.
It is a well known fact that such acts of brutality arouse appropriate response in a civil society.no country can claim to be free of such evils.what they can assure is a detering action against such acts so that the chances of repetition of such gruesome acts are minimal.
at the same time it is also a well known fact that brutality is a part of sub continental psyche.numerous incidents of barbarism either go un -noticed,or soon fade out of public memory.how many chances are there ,of the occurence of a sialkot or a for that matter gujrat like massacre in a western world or america to be precise.lets confess,they have during last a few decades or may be a century developed their institutions in such a way that has contributed in the overall development of the society.human rights are respected in their society while in ours,they are still to be known.
and as far as history is concerned,lesser told is more for our gory past.people often associate a hint of arrogance and false glory with the dastardly acts of barbarism committed by their forefathers.rivers of blood and mountains of skulls were the signatures of victorious kings.ruthless killings of innocent people was a usual culmination of battles fought by baadshahs.so indeed barbarity is not the monopoly of America.
I fail to understand the message of this article. By quoting a few examples from history and linking them with the present and ignoring all of their other deeds, to me the writer lacks objectivity and is either pandering to his audience or simply a person bitter with his own personal experiences. Poor taste.
Thank you Mr. Khuro for showing us the true picture of US army.I support your endeavors.Nothing can justify mutilating human corpses and by writing this article you have reaffirmed my belief that Americans are no better than Taliban.
I don’t understand why people like Nadir El Edroos have to bring in the Islam vs West debate in every single thing? This was an objective article, talking about the historical connections for the current American Armed Forces behavior. This wasn’t about defending Islam, Pakistan or Musalmans. By twisting it toward the Islam vs West debate, you yourself have fueled the rhetoric. I read your articles and I agree to them. Similarly I agree with what Mr Zarrar Khuro has written. That does NOT mean that I support the barbarity of the Taliban or Al Qaeda or LeT and so on and so forth. For God’s sake stop thinking all criticism directed towards the West is somehow a way of absolving us of our sins. We condemn what needs to be condemned whether it is us or them.
Yes Nadir, let’s make it about how bad we all are. I think its been a whole five minutes since someone mentioned it. This is how you will save us all, by telling us how terrible we all are!
I confess, I’m baffled by this focus on the alleged behaviours of Americans. The British Empire no longer exists and I’m sure its former exploited subjects are happy to live outside the old, toothless lion’s cage. When the British lion still had teeth, however, that beast did what was needed to exploit its colonies. Shall we discuss the dark side of empire? I’m up for it. Hell, most of the trouble in the Middle East can be traced directly to British rule.
Recent barbarity? Germans in WWII. Japan in WWII. Russian genocide. Turkish genocide. The slaughter in the former Yugoslavia. One could go on. Time for a refresher course in European history at least. Finally, war is evil and breeds evil. Brits have lots more experience with bloodbath politics than Americans.
Excellent & Amazing stuff well researched nice piece of work…………